Contact Markforged for Tooling, Equipment & Machinery Review

Engineering intake

What helps us respond with a useful additive manufacturing path?

Useful inquiries describe the current manufacturing bottleneck. Tell us whether you need a composite fixture, metal replacement part, printer-cell recommendation, bridge-production support, or a fast DfAM review. Include the CAD format, revision status, required quantity, target date, and any inspection or certification requirement. If a part is exposed to heat, chemicals, torque, repeated operator handling, or regulated production controls, include that too.

Markforged will not promise that additive manufacturing is always the answer. The review may recommend a printed route, a design adjustment, a conventional process, or a staged prototype before any purchase decision. That honesty protects your team from speed that creates downstream approval problems.

If your team is comparing an in-house printer cell against outsourced printed tooling, include the expected annual part count, preferred approval model, and who will own inspection after release. If the request concerns a replacement component for legacy equipment, include the current failure mode, dimensional reference, and whether the part is safety critical. If the project is a launch fixture, describe the pilot-build window, the operator interaction, and the consequence of late delivery. These details help the first response focus on risk, not generic sales language.

For regulated or customer-audited environments, note any ISO 9001:2015, AS9100D, ISO 13485:2016, ITAR, material certificate, or first-article expectation. We can then discuss which evidence belongs in the review packet and which claims should wait until a written scope is agreed.