Responsible additive manufacturing

Markforged Sustainability Starts With Better Tooling Decisions

Sustainability in industrial additive manufacturing is not a slogan. It depends on where additive replaces wasteful tooling, where it reduces transport or downtime, and where it is documented honestly. Markforged frames environmental and compliance claims around measurable process behavior rather than unsupported absolutes.

Structured ESG data

Program-level indicators for buyers evaluating additive manufacturing.

IndicatorHow it is reviewedBuyer value
Material efficiencyCompare printed near-net tooling against machined billet or outsourced fixture waste.Lower scrap where geometry and load case fit additive manufacturing.
Transport reductionReview whether in-house or regional builds can remove expedited freight for urgent tools.Fewer emergency shipments and better launch control.
Tooling lifeDefine expected handling, wear surfaces, and replacement cadence before release.Avoids unsupported lifetime claims and helps plan spares responsibly.
Revision controlTrack version, material route, and inspection evidence for each released build.Reduces waste from uncontrolled reprints and obsolete fixtures.

All indicators should be validated against the buyer's operating conditions, facility records, and active production requirements.

Compliance checklist

Responsible programs keep the claim tied to evidence.

ISO 9001:2015 style controls

Revision records, supplier communication, and inspection checkpoints help keep additive tooling from becoming an informal exception.

RoHS and REACH awareness

Material selection and customer requirements should be documented where tooling or equipment touches regulated product environments.

Documented operating assumptions

Temperature, load, contact surfaces, cleaning exposure, and handling rules should be stated before sustainability benefits are claimed.

Measured rather than absolute claims

Markforged avoids language such as zero waste or guaranteed impact reduction. Any improvement should be tied to a defined baseline.

Evaluate additive impact with the same rigor as cost and quality.

Share the current fixture path, scrap concern, shipping issue, or downtime cost. We will help identify which sustainability claims can be supported and which should stay off the page.

Review Responsible AM